|
|
|
|
|
"At this time the (FBI) Albuquerque Division will not be opening an investigation into your claims. If you have proof of your allegations, please present that proof to your nearest Legal Attaché, or you may visit one of our FBI Divisions the next time you are in the United States. Thank you."  |
|
|
On 11th September 2018 it was seventeen years since US terrorists destroyed the complete WTC-complex at New York 'live on (faked) TV' and blamed it on another party - Usama Bin Laden, UBL, and Al Qaida. The US terrorists overlooked one important matter: No structure or tower can be destroyed by local structural failures up top caused, e.g. by a plane. In order to fool the public the US terrorists asked Hollywood to produce a movie showing the WTC towers being stricken by planes and collapsing (!?) from top down, etc, that the terrorists then broadcasted 'live on TV' when the complete WTC- complex was destroyed. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, is supporting the US terrorists and will not review the below information. In the decade since the 9/11 attacks, the FBI's intelligence program has tripled in size, and FBI analysts work around the world-from the war zone in Afghanistan to the White House Situation Room-to help covering up the Truth about 911. It is quite sad and the beginning of the end of the USA.
Meeting about the POUFF, POUFF theory at Albuquerque, 10 November, 2010 You can study the
Björkman presentation here
and below! The meeting was very
popular. The American
audience quickly understood that no skyscraper
can ever progressively, globally collapse POUFF,
POUFF by gravity from top down due to a structural
failure (or fire) up top and that allegedly
scientific reports by terrorists like
professor Bazant of Northwestern University and dr.
Sunder of NIST are false. The audience
also understood that all videos and pictures of a
structural collapse from top down and its rubble on
ground on 911 are false! It is 100% Computer
Graphic Images, i.e. virtual models. One lady in
the audience asked who could have produced the CGI
movie that was shown "live on TV" on
9-11? Good question. And the good news are that the
Federal
Bureau of
Investigation,
FBI, at Albuquerque, is investigating that right
now! They contacted me after the presentation to
this effect! I wonder what FBI will do. Go back to
sleep? On Nov. 29, 2010,
13.40 pm, FBI has however clarified: "At this
time the Albuquerque Division will not be opening
an investigation into your claims. If you have
proof of your allegations, please present that
proof to your nearest Legal
Attaché,
or you may visit one of our FBI Divisions the next
time you are in the United States. Thank you."
Actually, I had
already presented proof of my allegations to the
FBI, Legal Attaché, Paris, that recommended
me to contact FBI at Albuquerque. It seems FBI and
Carol K.O. Lee, Special Agent in Charge of FBI
Albuquerque Division, are sleeping at the switches,
as usual, even if the case is opened and being
investigated. Or FBI chief Mueller decided
otherwise? The basic
question is: Strange 'planes' hit the tops and make holes in them? OK, why not? It is very easy to fake a plane crashing into a skyscraper! Will the big bottom parts below the holes then suddenly 'collapse'? From top? Down? Twice on same day? Into rubble?
Below are two more faked photos of the same object: You wonder why a big wall panel falling on side always is followed by a trail of smoke/dust. And why the smoke on top looks the same! Copy/paste of various layers of animations? Aha - Hollywood!  xx
Right is another
photo
of similar type, i.e. a fake (from the NIST
reports) showing steel wall panels and
debris falling from the top of the South Tower,
WTC2, while the bottom part of WTC2 in the
background is still intact. The picture is
evidently a fake! It is just another stupid
animation created by same terrorists and Photoshop!
And dishonest photographers. Terrorists! Imagine - there
is a small fire up top in a skyscraper and suddenly
the four solid perimeter walls - steel panels - are
ripped off six floors apart, i.e. at two locations
top/bottom and are pushed out and then fall down on
the streets below followed by clouds of dust
and a photographer (terrorist?) snaps a picture of
it - just when the panels pass by ... while the
bottom of the skyscraper is still
intact! Unbelievable in
my view! It is of course impossible to snap such a
picture. But there are people making fake pictures.
They are of course terrorists! And FBI or
any US authority does nothing about it. Amazing.
FBI does not react! Big parts -
steel wall panels - dropping from skyscraper =
ridiculous! Prove me wrong and win
€1.000.000:-
(Note - photo is evidently a
fake!) It is not strange
that an identical (or slightly 'repaired'
(!) upper right corner) steel wall panel pops up on
another photo
right attributed to Richard Drew,
AP. Now the steel
wall panel drops on the Marriott hotel in downtown
NY! But it is just amateurish Photoshop! Like all
terrorist photos of the 'collapses'. A
skyscraper can only get destroyed from bottom up! A
skyscraper can never collapse from top
down! Why is
described below! A false FEM
decription of a structural collapse is shown
here.
US authorities and terrorists believe that
structural components like beams are just ripped
apart ... by gravity ... and fly away! Sorry GWB
and Condi - you do not fool me! Bill
Biggart
is another photographer producing pictures, e.g.
this
(plane collides with WTC2) or this
(debris and panels fall from WTC2). Same part,
repaired (sic), dropping from skyscraper on hotel =
ridiculous! Prove me wrong and win
€1.000.000:-
(Note - photo is faked = photoshopped by Richard
Drew, AP)
There are many people in the USA that believe that tall steel tower structures can collapse or disappear in smoke and dust from top down initiated by a structural failure (e.g. plane crash) or fire up top. I call it the POUFF, POUFF-theory. It was launched by the US National Institute of Support of Terrorism, NIST, a non-regulated agency controlled by the US Department of Commerce, in its so called 911-report, where it is said that when ... the release of potential energy due to downward movement of the (top of the WTC) building mass above the buckled columns (the upper part C up top) exceeded the strain energy that could be absorbed by the structure (parts A below), global collapse ensued. It is the new BIG BANG theory in reverse! A structure disappears into a black hole in the basement!! It is a joke ... and it is the reason why the USA is losing its war of aggression in Afghanistan. Prof Bazant, famous terrorist, has another strange explanation in a paper from 2006! The supporting elements simply snaps through (?) - magically - and the structure becomes a heap of rubble as shown below:
 The upper part C is originally carried by four parts A1, 2, 3 and 4 below one above the other of similar structure, even if lowest part A4 is four times stronger than A1 and five times stronger than C. A1 is just double as strong as C. Then upper part C is given downward motion due to gravity (some supports between parts C and top A1 are buckled) and upper part C applies, when impacting A1, released potential energy on the top part A1 that is crushed down into rubble B - POUFF - as top A1 cannot absorb the energy applied! The first part A1 becomes smoke and dust or rubble B or whatever. It cannot really be seen due to the smoke and dust. Then the rubble B or the smoke (?) is accelerated by the intact upper part C and gravity and more released potential energy is applied on the second part A2 that is crushed into more rubble B - another POUFF - as second part A2 cannot absorb the energy applied! The second part A2 becomes more smoke and dust or more B or whatever. It cannot be seen either. Smoke, you know! The crushing down will be repeated as many times as is required to crush parts A3 and A4 into rubble B or smoke and dust. In this example the third and fourth parts A3 and A4 thus become smoke and dust or even more B or whatever. Then all A parts are B because all A parts could not absorb the energy applied by intact upper part C! Then the rubble B crushes up intact upper part C into more rubble B - the second final POUFF! The last POUFF is that B becomes a pyramid shaped heap of rubble. Bazant has confirmed it July 2010! It cannot be seen - so you have to believe Bazant. Or ... The POUFF, POUFF-theory was in fact originally developed by terrorist professor Zdenek P. Bazant, F.ASCE & Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, (a US nest of terrorists!! - FBI take note!) already 2001, in Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis . My contribution 2010 is to name it POUFF, POUFF! It is plenty smoke and dust. Repeatedly. The Bazant & Co simple one-way crush-down theory is applicable to all structures regardless of size and details of elements and joints of the structure; Above it is applied to a structure consisting of five assemblies of structural elements - one upper part C and four lower parts A1, A2, A3 and A4; All parts consists 95% of air and the rest is steel elements holding it together. The uniform density (total mass (kg) divided by total volume (m3)) of any part C and A is 250 (kgs/m3). Each part has height h. Thus total structure has height 5 h. (1) Lower parts A carries upper part C of the structure statically with a FoS >1 (actually >3 so that part C will not collapse down by itself before start). Primary load bearing elements make up <1% of the structure volume. Upper part C is then dropped on top part A1 by gravity and one way crush-down, suggested by Bazant & Co, starts. The suggested reason is that upper part C can apply sufficient energy to destroy - snap-through - elements in part A1 and compress them into rubble part B without destroying itself, C. It is of course crazy! Part C cannot apply energy to destroy part A1 without destroying itself! In all normal cases upper part C would just bounce on top of A1 and come to rest on top of A1 with some minor local damages on A1 and C. Simple energy balance proves it. Evidently part C cannot apply any energy on A1 without destroying itself C, and C cannot ever accelerate any rubble B. There is not enough energy available! What is seen on all videos of WTC 1&2 destructions is just animations and simulations produced by the movie industry type the Indpendence Day movie 1995! Imagine that the terrorists managed to put a movie on all US major TV channels on 9-11. (2) POUFF!! Upper part C has crushed top part A1 into rubble part B A1/4; The density of part B rubble is 4 times the density of C and A1 according Bazant, i.e 1000. Part C has dropped 3/4 h. Upper Part C remains intact according to Bazant & Co. In reality it cannot happen, but Bazant & Co suggest otherwise! (3) POUFF!! Upper part C has crushed two top parts A1 and A2 into rubble part B A/2; Part C has dropped 1.5 h! The rubble B assists the crushing of part A2. (4) POUFF!! Upper part C has crushed three top parts A1, A2 and A3 into rubble part B 3A/4; Part C has dropped 2.25 h. The rubble B assists the crushing of part A3. (5) POUFF!! Upper part C has crushed all four parts A1, A2, A3 and A4 into rubble part B = one part A; Part C has dropped 3 h. The rubble B assists the crushing of part A4. (6) POUFF!! Rubble part B (!) has crushed up (?) upper part C into rubble from below. Parts A and C with density 250 have become 100% rubble of height 1.25 h and 'rubble' density 1000. (7) The rubble then spills out on the ground POUFF!!, according Bazant & Co (and is more compressed to density >1000?). The destruction goes very fast! At about 65% of gravity acceleration g (about 9.82 m/s²) according Bazant. Evidently no structure A can be found on Earth that goes POUFF!! POUFF!! POUFF!! POUFF!! POUFF!! from top down, when you drop a small top piece C on it by gravity, but according to terrorist professor Zdenek P. Bazant all structures with density 250 kg/m3 shall go POUFF, POUFF and become rubble with density 1 000 kg/m3 only du to gravity. The Bazant madness is further analyzed here. And here! Terrorist Bazant has been reported to the FBI several times ... but the FBI sleeps at the switches as usual and ... sleeps. That's why the USA will be attacked again by the terrorists, which all are Americans BTW. Anders Björkman, M.Sc., President, Heiwa Co.
(published 030310 by Heiwa Co - European Agency for Safety at Sea) |
