Many people wonder who I am and why I do this web site about false atomic bombs 1945, invented Moon trips 1969, unreal, sinking Estonia incident 1994 and 911 fantastic tower collapses 2001 and other things. Why not leave people suffering from cognitive dissonance - their intelligence tells them one thing, but their amygdala tells them under no circumstances to push it - alone with their dreams?
1999 I repaired a ship at Mombasa, Kenya, and met, by chance, a very nice and intelligent German/Saxon girl, EM, whose father, WM, was a former Uppersilesian mine worker that 1945 had fled to Saxony, had as a Wismut AG employé assisted Stalin to build a Soviet a-bomb 1949 but had 1958 been tortured by and kicked out of the German Democratic Republic leaving little EM alone behind. EM had fled later herself and wanted to move back to Saxony, when she retired. Saxony was then, 1999, a sad place after 40 years of East German communist terror 1949/89. It was an interesting experience. 2001 EM and I spent time at Freiberg i. Sa, when USA was attacked by some Arabs 911 according media. We watched it on TV by chance. "It doesn't look real", said EM. "I agree", I said, based on my knowledge of Mechanical Sciences. Structures do not collapse from top down. I can prove it. EM got sick at little later and died suddenly 2002. EM really encouraged me with my M/S Estonia and 911 works. "The people should know the Truth", she maintained. And there we are today. No US a-bombs exploded 1945 and no Stalin a-bomb 1949 based on my experiences in Japan and with EM's father. And M/S Estonia didn't lose the bow visor 1994. And no Arabs destroyed NY skyscrapers from top down by gravity 2001. I have also added the US human space travel hoaxes 1961-2016 to my web site. There is one common feature of all these events. Assisted by propaganda spread by media people believe they took place as suggested by the authorities, while I conclude they never happened or that something else happened based on my cosmopolitan experiences and clear thinking. I know plenty people get upset learning my conclusions but they haven't seen the world I have seen, by chance, in my interesting life. Life is full of chances! Most people do not take them. But it is never too late. Reconsider what you believe as true and live happier.
Click on links above and below to get started.
On 28 September 2018, it
is 24 years since the M/S Estonia sank in
the Baltic Sea 1994 and Prime Minister Carl
Bildt ordered Swedish Accident Investigation
Board, SHK, to confirm that the visor had fallen
off and caused the accident. Bildt knew that
the M/S Estonia transported military
contraband and that certain parties did not like
it. The SHK Director General Olof Forssberg
was eager to help Bildt and SHK shipbuilding
technical expert, my old friend, navy commander
Börje Stenström invented a fantasy
story that media announced as TRUTH. I didn't
believe it. The above three persons covered up a
crime incl. kidnapping of innocent people. Media
helped. The story is still going on ...
On 28 September 2018, it is 24 years since the M/S Estonia sank in the Baltic Sea 1994 and Prime Minister Carl Bildt ordered Swedish Accident Investigation Board, SHK, to confirm that the visor had fallen off and caused the accident. Bildt knew that the M/S Estonia transported military contraband and that certain parties did not like it. The SHK Director General Olof Forssberg was eager to help Bildt and SHK shipbuilding technical expert, my old friend, navy commander Börje Stenström invented a fantasy story that media announced as TRUTH. I didn't believe it. The above three persons covered up a crime incl. kidnapping of innocent people. Media helped. The story is still going on ...
Det kan ju vara av intresse att veta
varför lilla senegalflaggade M/S 'Joola'
kapsejsade och sedan flöt upp och ned på
det oskadade skrovet den 28 september 2002 utanför
Gambia. Hennes deplacement var ca 2 150 ton och
dödvikten 500 ton vid djupgående d=3.1 meter.
Hennes metacentrum M var ca 5,9 meter över kölen
K, KM=5,9 m.
The M/V AL SALAM BOCCACCIO 98, was a Panama registered ropax vessel, which sank on 3 February, 2006, at approximately 01.33 hours Egypt local time (23.33 hours UTC on February 02, 2006), during a short international voyage across the Red Sea, where she departed from the Port of Duba, Saudi Arabia, with destination to Safaga, Egypt.
It was suggested that (i) a fire broke out in the main RO-RO cargo space - garage - in the ship's superstructure (car deck), that (ii) water of the spray fire extinguishing system used to extinguish the fire could not escape, as (iii) the scuppers were blocked and that (iv) the weight of this water caused the vessel to capsize and sink and (v) that >1 000 persons drowned, while the Master and crew just watched and didn't contact the ship owner at Cairo. I think sabotage took place - of ship and of investgation.
The Italian flag/registry M/S Costa Concordia was incorrectly designed, substandard, unsafe and not seaworthy at departure 13 January 2012 with ship owner's and Italian maritime authority's knowledge and the insurances were not valid. Crew, mostly underpaid foreigners, were not available aboard to muster passengers and escort them to the lifeboats and to launch all lifesaving appliances to enable safe and complete abandon ship of all passengers in an emergency. The ship had 25 illegal, watertight doors in the hull that caused the capsize the following day. Media has never reported these simple facts. By pure luck most people aboard managed to leave the ship anyway before it capsized and sank. Later the wreck was salvaged, put in drydock and ... finally towed to sea and was sunk .... again!
You expect that the marine industry really wants to learn from accidents to achieve better safety.
Accidents occur every day at sea. Do we learn anything from the investigations? Are the corrective measures right? Three very big accidents come to mind - the Exxon Valdez grounding in 1989 (35 000 tonnes of crude oil spilled), the Estonia sinking in 1994 (at least 852 dead) and the Erika sinking in 1999 (>10 000 tonnes of heavy fuel spilled). What do these three accidents have in common? One answer is that the casualty investigations were not done as agreed by the IMO. The IMO has adopted resolutions about how accident investigations shall be done since more than 40 years. The early resolutions were recommendations; the latest is a Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents. If the spirit of the resolutions is followed, there should be no problem. The resolutions are sometimes not followed. Independent innovators of better safety at sea like Heiwa Co have difficulties.
According PART A, MANDATORY STANDARDS REGARDING PROVISIONS OF THE ANNEX TO THE STCW CONVENTION, Chapter VI: Standards regarding emergency, occupational safety, security, medical care and survival functions, Knowledge, understanding and proficiency, all seamen should know and be trained about, e.g.:
(i) Safety precautions during launch and recovery of a fast rescue boat, FRB,
(ii) Launching and recovery of fast rescue boat, FRB, in prevailing and adverse weather and sea conditions.
I explain here all about a SOLAS Fast Rescue Boat, FRB, and why it is useless, unsafe, no means of rescue and kill seamen in spite of IMO recommending not to train with an FRB or that Port State Control, PSC, should not penalize ships not training with an FRB, etc. And why the IMO is doing nothing.
Recently (2006) a newly built passenger ship suddenly - in a few seconds without warning - rolled over >20° in fine weather and many passengers were hurt losing balance and being thrown into walls and on decks. All water in the deck swimming pool flowed out. There was panic. Then the vessel stabilized itself at abt 15° angle of list and slowly the vessel became upright again. Why did this happen?
It has of course happened before! A couple of years ago (1999) it happened to another newly built passenger ship at breakfast time. The ship suddenly rolled over, the whole breakfast buffet was thrown into the wall and on the deck and passengers lost balance and were thrown around. The ship owners quickly blamed the sudden loll on the rudders (sic)! They had turned too quickly and the vessel listed. Do you believe that? In the latter case the vessel remained at >15° list even after the rudders were put back straight. And slowly the vessel became upright. What actually happened?
Vinnova - Verket för innovationssystem - fick i april 2001 uppdrag att hantera regeringens beslutade program för utvecklings- och forskningsarbete inom sjösäkerhetsområdet.
Bakgrund - Estonia hade en rad sjösäkerhetsbrister
Vinnova säger själv på sin webbsida att bakgrunden för detta beslut var bl.a. Estoniakommissionens lämnade slutrapport (5) om M/S 'Estonia's förlisning:
"I rapporten (5) konstaterade kommissionen att fartyget hade en rad sjösäkerhetsbrister. Dessa avsåg bl.a. fartygets konstruktion, utrymningsmöjligheter och rutiner, räddningsutrustning och räddningssystem. Enligt kommissionen var det huvudsakligen dessa brister som låg bakom olyckan och dess allvarliga konsekvenser. Kommissionen rekommenderade även andra åtgärder för att förbättra sjösäkerheten, bl.a. framtagande av system för kvalitetssäkring vid konstruktions och tillverkning av fartyg, säkerhetsanalyser, system för utrymning och räddning efter ett fartygshaveri och ny livräddningsutrustning".
This paper should have been read at the 'Learning from Marine Incidents II' conference in London 14 March 2002. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects howevere decided to stop the presentation, so you have to read it here.
Marine accidents occur every day. Most accidents are minor and are investigated by professional hull or P&I underwriters surveyors to everyone's satisfaction. Some accidents are bigger and may be investigated by persons from the flag states accident investigation board. The results of such investigations and subsequent reports may contribute to safety at sea. Unfortunately where extremely serious incidents occur, such as large oil spills or ferry sinkings with a large death toll, there is a danger that the subsequent investigation becomes entangled with vested interests and the cause of the incident attributed may vary from the actual causes. Regrettably this can mean a deterioration in safety at sea. The author looks at some recent marine accidents and the resulting investigations.
The COULOMBI EGG oil tanker design is the only alternative to Double Hull tankers approved by the IMO in accordance with Marpol I/13F(5) since 1997. It was developed 1990-1997 by Anders Björkman, Heiwa Co and it's superior environmental protection and tanker safety are adapted according to damage statistics to minimize all known risks. After IMO approved it USA announced that such tankers could not enter US ports!
Klas Brännström, Karin Andersson, Mats Viberg, Svetlana Adamovic, Jonas Ringsberg, Per Hogström och Chalmers TH:s oredliga forskning 2006-2014. Chalmers bekräftar 2015 - Arkimedes gäller ej i Sverige 2016:
"Chalmers goda rykte bibehålls genom att inte samarbeta med dig"
Vad kan nya rektorn Stefan Bengtsson säga om det? Svar - ingenting!
Most FPUs - Floating Production Units - are FPSOs - Floating Production Storage & Offloading units built similar to sea going oil tankers, i.e. enlarged pontoons. However an FPSO is not an oil tanker and the optimum design should be completely different. Like a life buoy - or a cake. And then it can be built on one or more 50x50 meters slipways. There is no need for a long building dock or similar. But you need a jetty and a free space of abt 200 meters outside the jetty to moor the complete, assembled unit for outfitting. It is also good to have 30 meters depth outside the jetty.
The M/T 'Erika' tanker incident outside Brittany the 11 and 12 December 1999 has provoked questions. The Erika broke apart on 12 December 1999, while underway at sea and spilled >10 000 tons of heavy fuel oil. Why? A very stupid answer was given 21 February 2005!
The M/T Prestige suffered a fracture in the side shell on 14 November 2002 during a spell of very severe weather outside Spain. The Master aboard, Captain Apostolos Mangouras, was not responsible for it. But he was jailed anyway ...
The double hull VLCC 'M/T Limburg', b. 2000, suffered an explosion in the double hull on 6 October 2002, at the single point mooring buoy outside the offshore oil terminal of the Ash Shihr Terminal south east of Sanaa, Yemen. The vessel was 20% part-loaded with cargo in some wing tanks at the time and the weather was good. The draught of the ship may have been about 7-8 meters.
This was the first time that a serious explosion occurred in a double hull VLCC and the question is of course what caused it?
Most FPUs - Floating Production Units - are FPSOs - Floating Production Storage & Offloading units but you could also say that there is Fearfully Poor Safety Offshore!
An FPSO receives live crude from the sea floor, kills it in a topside production installation that sends the dead crude to storage tanks in the hull of the FPSO - the bottom side. Later the crude is offloaded to shuttle tankers at regular intervals.
Nu är det 2018 och 104 år sedan första världskriget bröt ut och 61 år sedan kalla kriget startade. Svenska skolor och media meddelar en version av historien som inte överensstämmer med min personliga uppfattning av första världskriget och vad som hände efteråt:
En bosnisk terrorist betald av hemliga krafter hade under sommaren 1914 i Sarajevo mördat Österrike/Ungerns kronprinsärkehertigpar, dvs en rätt dryg playboy med en helt korkad fru. Och 1945 dog en massa folk i Sétif!
Svenskar vet 2018 mycket litet om Östtyskland eller DDR, den tyska (o)demokratiska republiken, som var vårt grannland i söder under drygt 41 år 1949-1990. Anledningen är att svenska myndigheter och media tycker det är bäst att glömma hela skiten och Sveriges stöd av diktaturens brottslingar. Här följer min personliga sammanfattning av DDR:
Östtyskland/DDR grundades 1949 av några tyska kommunister i den av Sovjetunionen ockuperade delen av Tyskland efter andra världskriget veckan efter Förbundsrepubliken Tyskland bildades av USA, England och Frankrike. På en vecka delades Tyskland itu! Utan diskussion!
frilansjournalist, har konstiga idéer om
Estoniahaveriet och mig, Anders
skrev september 2007 flera artiklar i
om det och mig. De publicerades åtta
månader innan slutresultaten av
Estonias sjunkförlopp på
uppdrag av regeringen offentliggjordes (maj
2008) och får ses som en del av den
regeringsledda vilseledningskampanjen om Estonia,
dvs ingen dokumenterad kritik får anges.
hjälper ju gärna till att vilseleda om
Estonia! "Estonia gick ... med
högsta möjliga fart i allt grövre
motsjö ... Allt tyder på att Estonias
bogvisir slets loss i den grova sjön. ... Hon
krängde våldsamt ett par gånger
men sjönk sedan mycket snabbt. ... Det är
detta, det så kallade
sjunkförloppet, som har
bäddat för teorierna om sabotage. Hon
sjönk helt enkelt för fort. ...
Amatörernas teorier om
förloppet är många ... gemensamt
för de flesta teorier är att det saknas
såväl bevis som trovärdiga vittnen,
etc, etc." I artiklarna anges att jag
är amatör när det gäller
sjösäkerhet, att jag är
ryktesspridare, att det inte finns
några bevis för mina
publicerade 1996-2007 att färjan inte var
sjövärdig, etc, och att jag vägrar
(!) uppge mina källor när Fokus
kontaktar mig. Men Fokus har emellertid
aldrig kontaktat mig och vägrar införa
rättelser. Varför kan inte Fokus
ange riktiga uppgifter om
Olle Rossander, svensk frilansjournalist, har konstiga idéer om Estoniahaveriet och mig, Anders Björkman. Rossander skrev september 2007 flera artiklar i veckotidningen Fokus om det och mig. De publicerades åtta månader innan slutresultaten av Vinnovas forskningsprojekt om Estonias sjunkförlopp på uppdrag av regeringen offentliggjordes (maj 2008) och får ses som en del av den regeringsledda vilseledningskampanjen om Estonia, dvs ingen dokumenterad kritik får anges. Media hjälper ju gärna till att vilseleda om Estonia!
"Estonia gick ... med högsta möjliga fart i allt grövre motsjö ... Allt tyder på att Estonias bogvisir slets loss i den grova sjön. ... Hon krängde våldsamt ett par gånger men sjönk sedan mycket snabbt. ... Det är detta, det så kallade sjunkförloppet, som har bäddat för teorierna om sabotage. Hon sjönk helt enkelt för fort. ... Amatörernas teorier om förloppet är många ... gemensamt för de flesta teorier är att det saknas såväl bevis som trovärdiga vittnen, etc, etc."
I artiklarna anges att jag är amatör när det gäller sjösäkerhet, att jag är ryktesspridare, att det inte finns några bevis för mina uppgifter publicerade 1996-2007 att färjan inte var sjövärdig, etc, och att jag vägrar (!) uppge mina källor när Fokus kontaktar mig. Men Fokus har emellertid aldrig kontaktat mig och vägrar införa rättelser. Varför kan inte Fokus ange riktiga uppgifter om sjunkförloppet?
Allt mörkertal om att terror hotar är väl ingen nyhet men ökar det? Redan Stalin använde sig av terror i Sovjetunionen 1917-1953, dvs helt enkelt mördade eller spärrade in alla verkliga eller inbillade motståndare. Det hotet förskräckte och skadade hela befolkningen permanent. Hitler använde sig också av terror i Tyskland 1933-1945, dvs helt enkelt mördade eller spärrade in alla verkliga eller inbillade motståndare - precis som Stalin.
On 28 September 2018 it is 24 years since M/S Estonia sank in the Baltic Sea and about 840 persons drowned and 12 Estonian crew members disappeared for good. The authorities managed to keep secret that the ferry was unseaworthy and transported ex-USSR war material in order to invent a completely improbable cause of accident; a wrongly designed bow visor that dropped off due to enormous wave impacts in very severe weather. But there was no real storm on 28 September 1994 and no visor fell off.
Sverige är ett märkligt land!
If you Google on Fast Rescue Boats, you'll find the Heiwa Co web page on first Google page. That page explains why a Fast Rescue Boat, FRB, is useless as a life saving appliance, LSA on ships at sea in spite of being a SOLAS requirement. Reason is that an FRB is difficult to launch from a seagoing ship and impossible to retrieve at sea and that seamen may be killed in the process. FRBs are not really supposed to be retrieved at sea! They are best used from shore!
Vad är en rättshaverist? (sid 32)
Enligt en svensk myndighet: Det är viktigt att komma ihåg att bara för att en person är arg och upprörd på myndigheter och politiker innebär inte det att de är rättshaverister. Det kan vara en adekvat reaktion på något som inte fungerar. Man ska också komma ihåg att en person med ett rättshaveristiskt beteende ofta har ett psykiskt lidande som tar sig uttryck i anklagande av andra. De här personerna lägger ned stor del av sin tid på att driva processer, klaga och överklaga och ofta sprider det sig till flera områden. De har en bristande förståelse för att andra människor inte alltid ser eller upplever samma sak som de gör, eller att deras beteende kan påverka andra negativt.
Artiklarna på denna websajt är ej skrivna av en rättshaverist och jag ar psykiskt helt frisk.
Brainwashed Americans think that compressing two Uranium metal pieces with a neutron in between at high pressure results in an explosion and that it was a good idea that the US Army Air Forces dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan August 1945 killing children and women. They do not understand that the destructions were simply staged events. The Americans were deceived (fooled) by their own leaders and media, while others got scared ... and are still worried. The Japanese towns were simply destroyed by conventional napalm carpet fire bombings because compressing two Uranium metal pieces to double density with a neutron in between at high pressure does not result in an explosion.
This article of mine about human and other, not so funny, space travel jokes and hoaxes is split up into 6 parts and many chapters for easy references and will take some time to study. Hope you will enjoy it. Most of it is quite hilarious. Imagine how events can be staged in space! Or actually on Earth. By Hollywood. No human beings have ever been in space.
Can a big, 400 meter tall skyscraper/tower with 110 floors collapse from top down by gravity into a heap of rubble due to small, local, structural damages up top at floors #92-96 caused by fire and create a Ground Zero? Answer - Yes! According to corrupt engineers! It happened twice on the same day.
The Official Version of
9/11 goes something like this: Directed by a beardy-guy from a
cave in Afghanistan, nineteen hard-drinking,
coke-snorting, devout Muslims enjoy lap dances
before their mission to meet Allah. Using nothing
more than craft knifes, they overpower cabin crew,
passengers and pilots on four planes. And hangover or not, they manage
to give the world's most sophisticated air defence
system the slip. Unfazed by leaving their "How to
Fly a Passenger Jet" guide in the car at the
airport, they master the controls in no-time and
score direct hits on two towers, causing
THREE to collapse completely. ...
The Official Version of 9/11 goes something like this:
Directed by a beardy-guy from a cave in Afghanistan, nineteen hard-drinking, coke-snorting, devout Muslims enjoy lap dances before their mission to meet Allah. Using nothing more than craft knifes, they overpower cabin crew, passengers and pilots on four planes.
And hangover or not, they manage to give the world's most sophisticated air defence system the slip.
Unfazed by leaving their "How to Fly a Passenger Jet" guide in the car at the airport, they master the controls in no-time and score direct hits on two towers, causing THREE to collapse completely. ...
You are requested to describe a structure where a small top part C can crush the much bigger bottom part A from above, when top part C is dropped by gravity on bottom part A.
Retired Navy SEAL Robert O'Neill acknowledged November 2014 that he had on the orders of US President B. Obama fired two rounds into the forehead of Usama Bin Laden during a 2011 raid on his secret compound in Pakistan. O'Neill says more and more people were becoming aware of his role and that his name was bound to become public anyway. Robert unfortunately killed in cold blood a person that had nothing to do with the destruction of the WTC-complex. Shit happens.
The American audience quickly understood that no skyscraper can ever progressively, globally collapse POUFF, POUFF by gravity from top down due to a structural failure (or fire) up top and that allegedly scientific reports by terrorists like professor Bazant of Northwestern University and dr. Sunder of NIST are false.
No Arab terrorists hijacked any US planes on 11 September 2001 to fly two of them into the WTC towers at New York. What was shown live on TV that day incl. two towers disappearing in clouds of dust was just a pre-recorded show to fool the American public to enable some crazy terrorists to start wars all over and collect money at the same time. The towers were demolished from bottom up but the same terrorists managed to convince US structural engineers at ASCE and NIST to suggest that structures collapse from top down. However, no structure can collapse from top down. The US structural engineers prostituted and sold themselves to some criminal terrorists. Imagine that! Imagine that a structural member pops out of a structure. Is it possible? Let's check it.
The US National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, at Washington, DC, has 2008 explained the complete destruction of skyscraper World Trade Centre 7 on 911 as a result of a single structural failure due to thermal expansion (due to a fire) initiating a 'classic progressive collapse' destroying the complete building.
There exist in structural damage analysis theory no such phenomenon: a 'classic progressive collapse' .
It is just a stupid invention, a fantasy, by non-regulatory, terrorist agency like NIST in support of terrorism. You should wonder why the NIST staff - covered persons - are not in jail.
The Odéon Tower in Monaco is built 2009-2015 at Bd de Ténao in Monaco by the French Vinci Company on behalf of Monegasque princepals (sic) at a small plot of steep land, that borders also to some small houses and villas of Beausoleil, France, on the other side of the border where I live ... but not behind the Odéon Tower.
global collapse ...
The theme of the 2013 Engineering Mechanics Institute conference was "Mechanics for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructures" and the program was a forum where engineers and mechanicians contribute their expertise to one of the most pressing questions of our society:
How can we make the nation's infrastructures safer, more durable, more affordable, and more environmentally friendly during their entire lifetime?
Professor Gianluca Cusatis and his secretary Ms. Jennie Edelstein of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of the Northwestern University, Tech Building Room A236, 2145 North Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-3109, Telephone: (847) 467-2673 had been kind enough to invite me to present the below scientific paper, peer reviewed and accepted by the EMI staff at Evanston 5-7 August, 2013.
The presentation was supposed to take place on August 7 at 10.15 am - 12.15 pm at 206 Arch Room of the Norris Center of the Northwestern University (Session 5.7).